will on commitment pooling

will ruddick on commitment pooling

adding page because of will’s response here: will on uncovering ness

1\ via michel bauwens tweet [https://x.com/mbauwens/status/1929143261572039076]:

* Beyond Redistribution lies Commitment Pooling https://willruddick.substack.com/p/beyond-redistribution… “We are entering a time when it is more and more clear that our recently inherited models of governance no longer serve the scale or intimacy of the challenges we face. *Rather than replicate old patterns of control and resentment … there is another much much older path: Commitment pooling. It begins with a shift in how we see leadership. Those with influence aren’t the problem … they can become stewards. But stewardship only becomes real when it is shared. No one leads alone. No one leads unseen. Imagine a community project where decisions aren’t made by the loudest voice or the biggest stake – but by visible, collective commitments. Many governance models speak to this but lack the integration by protocol and a transparent and trust worthy mechanism to keep **commitments accountable.”

still *this.. if **this..

won’t get to the root of problem.. legit freedom will only happen if it’s all of us.. and in order to be all of us.. has to be sans any form of measuringaccountingpeople telling other people what to do

2\ via grassrootsecon (Empowerment through Community Inclusion Currencies – will is founder) tweet [https://x.com/grassEcon/status/1924186750542295487]:

These systems aren’t being invented. They’re being revealed. Commitment Pooling protocols don’t create the metabolism, they make it visible. Trust, reciprocity, commitment cycles, these have been flowing in every community since before language.

rather.. trust is unconditional.. otherwise it’s embedded in judgment/measuring/accountibility/reciprocity (all cancerous distractions)..

the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]

there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance.. to facil the thing we’ve not yet tried: the unconditional part of left-to-own-devices ness.. for (blank)’s sake..

ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition

3\ more from will’s substack (linked to michel’s tweet above):

There are many offering answers for how to come into agreement .. visionary approaches: the Three Horizons, Holacracy, Sociocracy, Communism, Democracy… and so on. So many frameworks. All of them holding some truth – yet like blind folks all trying to describe an elephant …. they grasp at coherent integration of the commons. Not metaphorical commons. Living, breathing, grassroots economics.

It’s like a gaping hole in our map. No matter how you transfer or divide up governance – without a working mechanism for the commons … you end up back in a power-over structure… instead of a power-with one.

mech that would actually work toward common\ing ness: tech as nonjudgmental expo labeling

how we gather in a space is huge.. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us..

ie: imagine if we listen to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & use that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness)

the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]

there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance.. to facil the thing we’ve not yet tried: the unconditional part of left-to-own-devices ness.. for (blank)’s sake..

ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition

This is why I believe in the work of Elinor Ostrom … and weaving the deeper patterns of commons stewardship into protocol. Not as abstraction, but as function.

ostrom 8 et al.. still not deep enough to get to the root of problem

findings from on the ground ness:

1\ undisturbed ecosystem (common\ing) can happen

2\ if we create a way to facil the seeming chaos of 8b legit free people

Here’s the shift: you, as a person .. or together as a group .. begin by curating and tracking clear commitments. We value those commitments. We set limits—on how much any of us can pull from the pool. And we create transparent pathways for exchange.

i see commitment ness as a cancerous distraction.. even to self.. ie: the it is me ness et al.. if we want to be legit free.. we need more freedom/flow et al..

what we need to facil (track/curate/whatever): the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & use that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness)

The pattern is simple enough to fit in any worldview and simple enough to implement.

the ‘pattern’ is even simpler than anything w commitment ness.. anything with any form of m\a\p

This process – has many names across all cultures and in general is called commitment pooling …. it mirrors how living systems cooperate. It’s how we enter symbiosis.

to me .. this is whalespeak.. not how we would/could dance if we were legit free

We are entering a time when it is more and more clear that our recently inherited models of governance no longer serve the scale or intimacy of the challenges we face.

did it ever? to me.. been in sea world since forever..

*Rather than replicate old patterns of control and resentment … there is another much much older path: **Commitment pooling.

again.. still *this.. if **this..

*Imagine a community project where decisions aren’t made by the loudest voice or the biggest stake – but by visible, collective commitments. Many governance models speak to this but lack the integration by protocol and a transparent and trust worthy mechanism to **keep commitments accountable.

*rather.. imagine a system/life/org/whatever that’s about curiosity over decision making.. that would make **any form of m\a\p irrelevant

how we gather in a space is huge.. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us..



A commitment might be denominated in USD. Or in chairs. Hours of childcare. Kilowatt-hours of community energy.

  • One group brings infrastructure.
  • Another offers time.
  • A third pledges local adoption.
  • A fourth contributes money.

Each stake is different – but each is essential.

whether those pieces are essential or not (i think we have no idea what is essential for legit free people.. only what we assume is essential for whales in sea world.. aka: black science of people/whales law).. committing/accounting/recioprocating/whatevering them.. is a cancerous distraction

Influence flows not from dominance – but from what you’re willing to show up for.

This is not redistribution. It is reweaving.

it’s actually still redistributing same song.. until we let go of any form of m\a\p

A practice of aligning contributions with care … where power emerges from pooled trust, not delegated authority.
It invites those with more to lead … by risking more.
And invites those without monetary capital to lead … by offering what matters: time, skill, insight, roots.

we need a means that is less about invited ness (dave’s campfire analogy et al) and more about itch-in-the-soul ness.. if we want the dance to dance

again.. the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

Outrage may wake us up…
But coordination is what moves us forward.

depends on what ‘forward’ means.. need a deeper coord/org.. aka: org around legit needs.. if want the legit coord ness of the dance

This is not easy work.
It requires slowing down. Becoming visible. Choosing trust.

to me.. takes a lot of work ness is a red flag we’re doing it/life wrong

Now ask yourself:

  • What am I ready to commit to?
  • And… who am I ready to trust?

ooof.. to me.. more s is a red flags ness.. has to be all of us.. doing whatever (the unconditional part of left to own devices ness) for the dance to dance

_______

via another tweet [https://x.com/wor/status/1944705955595456779]:

What if your next credit card came from your community?

Commitment Pools are a simple, ancient way to access shared resources through trust.

not unconditional.. so not legit trust.. if any form of m\a\p

You contribute what you can (labor, food, care) and receive what you need, when you need it. Just tracked promises, fulfilled over time.

double dose of cancerous distractions

Groups link together to form a global credit network .. rooted in trust.

again.. not trust if measuring things

If you’ve ever used airtime or a Visa card, you already understand it. Now imagine it gives you access to meals, childcare, carpentry, seeds… from your neighbors.

This is credit for the/ of the commons https://open.substack.com/pub/willruddick/p/what-credit-cards-can-teach-us

_______

and another tweet [https://x.com/mbauwens/status/1950814396181352701]:

* How Commitment Pooling Fulfills the Principles of Franciscan Economics

https://willruddick.substack.com/p/meeting-franciscan-economics

@wor explains:

“As Juan Fernando Lucio teaches me about the grounding in Minga and Franciscan Economics in Colombia, it becomes clear that these traditions offer more than practical solutions – they carry the moral and spiritual depth needed to build lasting peace. The Minga teaches us to show up for one another without demand. Franciscan thought reminds us to do so with humility, love, and care for all creation. And Commitment Pooling gives us the tools to sustain this ethic – by *turning shared promises into coordinated action, and **transforming trust into a living system of peace, dignity, and mutual support.”

*if promise ness.. then manufactured coord action

**if legit trust.. mutual/reciprocal ness is cancerous distraction

notes/quotes form article:

Meeting Franciscan Economics – From Mweria in Kenya to Minga in Colombia

The Minga in Colombia, like the Mweria in Kenya, are ancient, living examples of economies based not on money, but on *mutual aid, relational trust, and shared responsibility. In both systems, people come together (without coercion or wage) to build homes, harvest fields, dig canals, or care for the vulnerable. **What governs them is not currency or contracts, but memory, reciprocity, and collective belonging.

*mutual/recip/responsibility/relational-trust..though they sound nice.. all cancerous distractions

relational trust: Relational trust is a type of trust built through positive, respectful, and reliable interactions between individuals within a group or community. ..Having confidence in others’ abilities and their capacity to fulfill their responsibilities effectively. 

yeah.. building trust.. reliable ness.. responsibility ness et all.. all cancerous distractions

What once appeared merely “natural” or customary is now illuminated as morally exemplarya holy economy in action.

resonates with this line from anarchist morality: Morality has therefore become the instrument of ruling classes to protect their privileges... and with graeber violence in care law and steiner care to oppression law et al

This moral anchor provides a powerful foundation—and with the right tools, it can be scaled and sustained even in today’s fragmented world. That’s where the language and functional mechanisms of commons in Commitment Pooling Protocol come in. Commitment Pooling translates the nature of the Minga into trackable, shareable, and adaptable commitments. It gives communities tools – (formalized commitments, ledgers, steward roles) to account for, coordinate, and expand their shared work without turning it into an extractive market.

the dance is about itch-in-the-soul as rhythm.. not any set/trackable commitment/accounts

______

later thread [https://x.com/wor/status/1957657063817113757]:

Cosmic-level reorientation of what we think economics is. Every culture has it. Kenya: Mweria Brazil: Mutirão Colombia: Minga … Older than money. Older than writing. Not barter. Not trade. It’s commitment pooling: the root economic system. We evolved to promise, show up, and care. 1/5

oh my.. i don’t think we’re about promise ness.. too much ie: graeber unpredictability/surprise law and graeber can’t know law for that.. am thinking bachelard oikos law is our root econ system.. ie: something every soul already craves

*Humanity’s Original Operating System From the Andes’ Ayni to the Philippines’ Bayanihan to European barn-raisings … Humans everywhere practiced **reciprocal labor and shared care. No bosses. No coins. Just rotating commitments, remembered in community. Global. Ancient. Genius. 2/5

*yeah.. i think that’s whalespeak.. because *this is all cancerous distraction.. reciprocity.. et al

*Credit Cards Run on Ancestral Logic Modern finance didn’t invent this. It abstracted it. Credit unions. Visa & Mastercard All rely on pooled trust, credit limits, and redemptions ..same as Minga or Mweria. 3/5

*oi

Ancestral Tech, Rebooted These systems are alive — and still evolving. This isn’t Community Currency, Mutual Credit or another “blockchain money.” It’s regeneration through commitment. 4/5

yeah.. that’s the key.. that’s the label.. and to me.. that’s the thing we can’t be doing if we want to be legit free.. and so it just perpetuates same song.. need to try something we’ve not yet tried: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

The Future Is Rooted We’re not going back. We’re remembering forward. And rebuilding economies with: Care. Reciprocity. Regeneration. The protocol is ancient. The network is alive. The future is cooperative. (pdf and audio book: https://willruddick.substack.com/p/grassroots-economics-the-book-is ) 5/5

to me.. this ‘care’ ness.. will just be more violence in care ness et al.. oi.. pearson unconditional law et al..

______

and another tweet [https://x.com/wor/status/1959551419112984607]:

Cosmo-Local Credit, From the Ground Up – Neighbors pooling value; networks routing support. What if everyday care—child-minding, repairs, food, *tutoring—could be recorded as promises that unlock fair, interest-free credit? That’s the idea behind commitment pooling: groups create simple vouchers for what they can offer, seed a shared pool, and swap to access what they need. Debt = your own vouchers held by the pool; redemption = delivering your promise. No interest, transparent limits, shared accountability. Why this matters now: conventional aid and finance often reward visible vulnerability and overlook mutual aid. Commitment pools flip that script—cooperation becomes eligibility, not disqualification. And when many local pools connect, we get cosmo-local credit: locally governed circles, globally linked for routing support (a framing popularized by @mbauwens / P2P Foundation). What changes on the ground? – **Wider access to essentials without interest – Real collateral from real contributions (vouchers) – Guarantors backing those with the least capacity – Clear, restorative pathways when obligations slip. If you care about financial inclusion, Islamic-finance-aligned lending (no riba), and scaling mutual aid without centralization, this is for you. Read the full piece: https://grassecon.substack.com/p/cosmo-local-credit-from-the-ground #CosmoLocal#MutualAid#CommunityFinance#FinancialInclusion#IslamicFinance#CooperativeEconomics#RegenerativeEconomy#TrustAsCurrency

*all the red flags/cancerous distractions won’t/can’t get to **legit needs..

_______

_______

______

_______

_____

______

______

_____