will on convince ness
If we can move toward elegant simplicity of shared protocols and applications of those across many ecosystems and their economies. Then we have legs and common language. We start walking our talk and do the doing. Trust growing from ourselves. There is no need to convince everyone. There are no enemies. There is nothing to rally against. There is only practice. Moving at the speed of trust.
via this exchange [https://x.com/wor/status/1988447844265500865?s=20] in borkedsys wor convo
graeber model law: ‘you’ll never ever be able to convince a person thru logical argument or even brilliant rhetoric that a free and just society is possible.. you can show them.. you can start doing it‘ – David Graeber
already on each heart ness.. will on convince ness
convo very resonating.. as i’m sure this is how i appear to many.. lately to ie: michel bauwens; nika dubrovsky; and probably lots of others
but i do believe that i did ‘practice’.. and then came costello screen\service law and warning ness et al..
and.. deeper.. i do believe we can’t convince others.. just need to get to problem deep enough.. that it’s what each soul already craves
this ‘no need to convince’ ness is huge/pivotal.. and the thing we’ve not yet tried (even borkedsys and will in their borkedsys wor convo are not keeping to it)
so as a result.. nothing to date has gotten to the root of problem (can’t be about convincing, about choosing sides/options et al)
legit freedom will only happen if it’s all of us.. and in order to be all of us.. has to be sans any form of measuring, accounting, people telling other people what to do
how we gather in a space is huge.. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us..
ie: imagine if we listen to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & use that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness)
the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness
[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]
there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance.. for (blank)’s sake..
ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition
otherwise we’ll keep perpetuating the same song.. the whac-a-mole-ing ness of sea world.. of not-us ness.. of part\ial ness.. [again].. for (blank)’s sake..
_______
we need a problem deep enough to resonate w/8b today.. via a mechanism simple enough to be accessible/usable to 8b today.. in an ecosystem open enough to set/keep 8b legit free
ie: org around a problem deep enough (aka: org around legit needs) to resonate w/8b today.. via a mechanism simple enough (aka: tech as it could be) to be accessible/usable to 8b today.. and an ecosystem open enough (aka: sans any form of m\a\p) to set/keep 8b legit free
findings from on the ground ness:
1\ undisturbed ecosystem (common\ing) can happen
2\ if we create a way to facil the seeming chaos of 8b legit free people
_____
______
______
______
_____
be you. 