part\ial ness
________
same on issuu
________
adding page as partial researches/experimentations are mounting.. ie: bi, commons, ..
just a few recent ie’s:
@kultursymposium
Do #commons bring more justice? Can they challenge political hierarchy? #citiesascommons #kswe16 pic.twitter.com/zPqK9MHxRD
probably not if we common partially.
@richdecibels
commons = any resource accessible to everyone. There are many commons. Most don’t provide food/shelter. That’s the problem.
so.. not yet commons..? perhaps commons = all the resources accessible to everyone
@rcbregman
‘Is universal basic income a poor tool to fight poverty? No, it’s the best.’ Brilliant piece by @2noame. huffingtonpost.com/scott-santens/
perhaps neither poor nor best..just partial. our ongoing perpetuation of not-us ness: partial ness
perhaps we keep missing it (betterness.. equity) because we keep doing part\ials.. and so .. we .. can’t dance. since the dance takes all of us.. and all the things.. no?
along the same lines.. we probably won’t get their with part\ial disengagement..
time to leap… for (blank)’s sake…
we need to go deep/simple/open enough..
______
not partial.. pretty much what – as the day ness reps.. [in the city too..but as the day seems to be what we often don’t accept/trust]
_______
let’s disengage from partial disengage as well
___________
from end notes of david graeber‘s theory of value:
268: 12 – false insofar as those who have this partial consciousness do not recognize its partiality..
part\ial ness is killing us all.. for (blank)’s sake
____________
___________