unjustifiable strategy

adding page as people keep asking for strategy [a plan of action or policy designed to achieve a major or overall aim.. “time to develop a coherent economic strategy”.. the art of planning and directing overall military operations and movements in a war or battle.. a plan for military operations and movements during a war or battle.. “nonprovocative defense strategies”] – oi oi oi.. so calling it/ours unjustifiable [not able to be shown to be right or reasonable]

[disclaimer: bartlett (r) strategy law and warning ness et al]

i guess best/cleanest (to me) short answer strategy:

graeber model law (graeber revolution law): ‘you’ll never ever be able to convince a person thru logical argument or even brilliant rhetoric that a free and just society is possible..  you can show them.. you can start doing it‘ – David Graeber

so unjustifiable strategy is to:

1\ model a community of people that are legit free for a year tops.. (have enough resources (money to get them).. so that that group of people can be on a paid sabbatical/vacation of sorts.. where legit needs are met w/o money.. till people forget about measuring

for that

2\ find/grok conditions/needs for people to be legit free .. (conditions: sans any form of m\a\p.. sans any red flags.. not even a raised eyebrowneeds: maté basic needs)

3\ devise/craft means to org around legit needs/conditions.. (tech w/o judgment/hierarchy to listen to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & use that data to connect people locally (and/or virtually) to explore that itch

ie: a nother way


unjustifiable strategy based on ..


1\ undisturbed ecosystem (common\ing) can happen

2\ if we create a way to ground the chaos of 8b legit free people

again.. note: warning ness from thinking restate/update 7.18

unjustifiable because:

1\ crazy? yes.. but what really is ridiculous?.

2\ might not work.. but i’ve seen too much to unsee.. and (for now anyway) seen\experienced/experimented with too much to quit spending my days to fine tune our findings.. in order to be ready to give it whenever/however we can.. for (blank)’s sake


for more details if you like.. perhaps start with these: short bp all the way to long ibp.. et al




other ways we’ve try to explain (when asked about strategy ness) in no specific order:

1\ perhaps we try/code money (any form of measuring/accounting) as the planned obsolescence w/ubi as temp placebo.. where legit needs are met w/o money.. till people forget about measuring

ie: ubi as temp placebo.. (people thinking they have money when really just getting whatever they legit need.. till they forget about measuring)

2\ 2 convers as infra

3\ imagine if we just focused on listening to the itch-in-8b-souls.. first thing.. everyday.. and used that data to augment our interconnectedness.. we might just get to a more antifragile, healthy, thriving world.. the ecosystem we keep longing for..

what the world needs most is the energy of 8b alive people

need 1st/most: means to undo our hierarchical listening to self/others/nature ie: tech as it could be

4\ oikos (the economy our souls crave).. ‘i should say: the house shelters day-dreaming, the house protects the dreamer, the house allows one to dream in peace.’ – gaston bachelard, the poetics of space

5\ art (by day/light) and sleep (by night/dark) as global re\set.. to fittingness (undisturbed ecosystem)

6\ cure ios city

7\ a nother way book

8\ a story

9\ humanity needs a leap.. to get back/to simultaneous spontaneity .. simultaneous fittingness.. everyone in sync..

10\ gershenfeld something else law

11\ a people experiment




from david graeber‘s anarchy in manner of speaking:


You get a very intimate sense of the pulse of revolutionary practice, which then as now was very much anarchist in spirit; if you try to put it into words, it usually ends up sounding crude and naive. But ultimately it’s grounded in a very sophisticated understanding.

huge.. unjustifiable strategy ness.. and not yet scrambled ness and grokking ness.. et al

I remember being very impressed as a teenager when I read somewhere that if you look at the very early 20th century in countries like Spain or Italy, where half of the labor unions were anarchists and half were socialist, the biggest difference was that the socialist demands always focused on more wages and the anarchist, on less hours. One was saying “We want a consumer society for everyone, but we want a bigger share (oh yes and we also want it to be self managed)”; the other wanted out of the system entirely.

huge huge huge.. need a legit global re\set.. hari rat park law et al..

humanity needs a leap.. to get back/to simultaneous spontaneity .. simultaneous fittingness.. everyone in sync..

aka: an undisturbed ecosystem

‘in undisturbed ecosystems ..the average individual, species, or population, left to its own devices, behaves in ways that serve and stabilize the whole..’ –Dana Meadows