unjustifiable strategy

adding page as people keep asking for strategy [a plan of action or policy designed to achieve a major or overall aim.. “time to develop a coherent economic strategy”.. the art of planning and directing overall military operations and movements in a war or battle.. a plan for military operations and movements during a war or battle.. “nonprovocative defense strategies”] – oi oi oi.. so calling it/ours unjustifiable [not able to be shown to be right or reasonable]

[disclaimer: bartlett (r) strategy law and warning ness et al]

i guess best/cleanest (to me) short answer strategy:

graeber model law (graeber revolution law): ‘you’ll never ever be able to convince a person thru logical argument or even brilliant rhetoric that a free and just society is possible.. you can show them.. you can start doing it‘ – David Graeber

so unjustifiable strategy is to:

1\ model a community of people that are legit free for a year tops.. (have enough resources).. so that that group of people can be on a sabbatical/vacation of sorts.. where legit needs are met w/o money.. till people forget about measuring

for that

2\ find/grok conditions/needs for people to be legit free .. (conditions: sans any form of m\a\p.. sans any red flags.. not even a raised eyebrow… needs: maté basic needs)

3\ devise/craft means to org around legit needs/conditions.. (tech w/o judgment/hierarchy to listen to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & use that data to connect people locally (and/or virtually) to explore that itch

ie: a nother way

_________

unjustifiable strategy based on ..

findings:

1\ undisturbed ecosystem (common\ing) can happen

2\ if we create a way to ground the chaos of 8b legit free people

again.. note: warning ness from thinking restate/update 7.18

unjustifiable because:

1\ crazy? yes.. but what really is ridiculous?.

2\ might not work.. but i’ve seen too much to unsee.. and (for now anyway) seen\experienced/experimented with too much to quit spending my days to fine tune our findings.. in order to be ready to give it whenever/however we can.. for (blank)’s sake

________

for more details if you like.. perhaps start with these: short bp all the way to long ibp.. et al

________

other ways we’ve try to explain (when asked about strategy ness) in no specific order:

1\ perhaps we try/code money (any form of measuring/accounting) as the planned obsolescence w/ubi as temp placebo.. where legit needs are met w/o money.. till people forget about measuring

ie: ubi as temp placebo.. (people thinking they have money when really just getting whatever they legit need.. till they forget about measuring)

2\ 2 convers as infra

3\ imagine if we just focused on listening to the itch-in-8b-souls.. first thing.. everyday.. and used that data to augment our interconnectedness.. we might just get to a more antifragile, healthy, thriving world.. the ecosystem we keep longing for..

what the world needs most is the energy of 8b alive people

need 1st/most: means to undo our hierarchical listening to self/others/nature ie: tech as it could be

4\ oikos (the economy our souls crave).. ‘i should say: the house shelters day-dreaming, the house protects the dreamer, the house allows one to dream in peace.’ – gaston bachelard, the poetics of space

5\ art (by day/light) and sleep (by night/dark) as global re\set.. to fittingness (undisturbed ecosystem)

6\ cure ios city

7\ a nother way book

8\ a story

9\ humanity needs a leap.. to get back/to simultaneous spontaneity .. simultaneous fittingness.. everyone in sync..

10\ gershenfeld something else law

11\ a people experiment

________

_________

________

from david graeber‘s anarchy in manner of speaking:

9

You get a very intimate sense of the pulse of revolutionary practice, which then as now was very much anarchist in spirit; if you try to put it into words, it usually ends up sounding crude and naive. But ultimately it’s grounded in a very sophisticated understanding.

huge.. unjustifiable strategy ness.. and not yet scrambled ness and grokking ness.. et al

I remember being very impressed as a teenager when I read somewhere that if you look at the very early 20^th century in countries like Spain or Italy, where half of the labor unions were anarchists and half were socialist, the biggest difference was that the socialist demands always focused on more wages and the anarchist, on less hours. One was saying “We want a consumer society for everyone, but we want a bigger share (oh yes and we also want it to be self managed)”; the other wanted out of the system entirely.

huge huge huge.. need a legit global re\set.. hari rat park law et al..

humanity needs a leap.. to get back/to simultaneous spontaneity .. simultaneous fittingness.. everyone in sync..

aka: an undisturbed ecosystem

‘in undisturbed ecosystems ..the average individual, species, or population, left to its own devices, behaves in ways that serve and stabilize the whole..’ –Dana Meadows

_______

from david graeber‘s at long last (david on turner’s fire of jag):

13

This focus not just on the intellectual but also on the “affective” dimension, on “patterns of feeling and motivation,” is, of course, extremely unusual for the structural analysis of myth. Most of those who study myths would never be able to attempt such an analysis..t, except perhaps speculatively, since they deal with stories told long ago or far away, often in languages no one has spoken for centuries. We would have little way of knowing if there were certain incidents in the story of Inanna and Dumuzi, or the Labors of Hercules, that Babylonian or Greek audiences considered particularly amusing or terrifying. The response is to create forms of mythic analysis where such questions don’t really matter. *Terry’s many decades of fieldwork, in contrast, meant that he had heard the same stories over and over from different narrators and, as a result, knew exactly what parts were supposed to be funny, which scary, as well as what was idiosyncratic in any given performance and what essential to the narrative itself. This in turns allows him to read myths in their social context as oriented to shaping desires and sensibilities in a way that more intellectualist readings simply can’t.. t