michael (haupt) on funding ness
michael haupt on funding ness
via michel bauwens tweet [https://x.com/mbauwens/status/2112795025574941129?s=20]:
< ” the Market has capital ready, but the *coordination (or governance) layer connecting it to the **people already doing the work is thin. ” >
to me.. (warning ness).. *if gov.. not ‘coord’ of legit free people.. not the dance.. and **no one yet is already doing it
https://frameros.substack.com/p/decade-dramatic-disruption-invitation?
How do you fund regenerative, contributory work ?
if contributory ness.. not legit regen ness.. rather.. simply (aka: takes a lot of work/time ness) regen ing sea world
* you can rely on your own, but if we are all poor and in need ourselves, this is difficult
key word is all.. nothing to date has gone that deep
* we can rely on public funding, which requires political alliances, which may come back to bite us
already biting us.. ever since that day
* we can rely on the self-interest of the market, but this require becoming ‘visible’ to the market.
huge.. ie: naming the colour.. graeber can’t know law.. batra hide in public law.. you can see everything et al
let’s try/code money (any form of measuring/accounting/people telling other people what to do) as the planned obsolescence.. where legit needs are met w/o money.. till people forget about measuring..ie: sabbatical ish transition
Michael Haupt:
“Along all of those rivers are groups of people doing Sunday morning hacks, or their local equivalent. Now, money has arrived looking for exactly this kind of work, but it can’t find these groups of hackers, because the work is scattered across farms and volunteers, and there is no single body that can promise the results, measure it and stand behind it. So far, the disclosed money paying for outcomes comes to about ZAR100 million against a total of ZAR2.5 billion raised. The way I read this is that the Market has capital ready, but the coordination (or governance) layer connecting it to the people already doing the work is thin.
huge red flags.. oi..
findings (aka: the things i can’t unsee) from on the ground ness deep dive and why we need tech w/o judgment
ie: the dance won’t dance unless/until it’s 1\ all of us 2\ legit free
and again.. nothing to date (ever since that day) has gotten to that root of problem
legit freedom will only happen if it’s all of us.. and in order to be all of us.. has to be sans any form of measuring, accounting, people telling other people what to do
So the lesson Stage Three teaches us is that the initiatives that once begged now find themselves being asked, being invited to partner with the Market. The question now shifts from ‘how to get funded’ toward how to become something the long money can contract with, on terms the place sets first. That is a coordination challenge, and solving it is what a BioHub exists for. “
that question just keeps perpetuating the same song.. the whac-a-mole-ing ness of sea world.. of not-us ness.. of part\ial ness.. perpetuating survival triage.. for (blank)’s sake..
deeper question: what are the conditions for all of us to be legit free
we need a problem deep enough to resonate w/8b today.. via a mechanism simple enough to be accessible/usable to 8b today.. in an ecosystem open enough to set/keep 8b legit free
ie: org around a problem deep enough (aka: org around legit needs) to resonate w/8b today.. via a mechanism simple enough (aka: tech as it could be) to be accessible/usable to 8b today.. and an ecosystem open enough (aka: sans any form of m\a\p) to set/keep 8b legit free
_______
another/next on michael by michel [https://x.com/mbauwens/status/2112793938025496641?s=20]:
Should the archipelago’s link themselves to the market ?
https://frameros.substack.com/p/decade-dramatic-disruption-invitation?
Michael Haupt thinks they should:
“This is the invitation the Decade of Dramatic Disruption offers: Map who in your own place is already doing stage-two work that stage-three money has started pricing. Clearing, spring protection, fire breaks, seed saving, and related initiatives. Learn their names. Introduce two of them to each other. A guide’s usefulness starts with knowing who’s already doing the actual work. Then offer to connect them to the Market. This is where the magic will start happening: when the vast coordination potential of the Market meets the about-to-explode passion of the Emergent.”
again.. not if any form of m\a\p
we need a legit nother way.. because.. the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness.. and any form of market ness (aka: 10-day-care-center\ness; graeber violence/quantification law; et al) keeps us from that/us
[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]
there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance.. into the space of legit freedom
ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition
again.. otherwise we’ll keep perpetuating the same song.. the whac-a-mole-ing ness of sea world.. of not-us ness.. of part\ial ness.. perpetuating survival triage.. for (blank)’s sake..
note: on survival ness: survival is a means to survive things as they are.. so to me.. not a legit alt.. it’s triage.. perpetuating survival triage.. so a temp band aide per se.. that will /can help now.. but only for short term.. because it still doesn’t get to the root of the problem.. so it won’t offer/lead-to legit change/life/freedom.. et al.. so.. to me.. it’s still a cancerous distraction to the dance
_______
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
______
