intro’d to micah via 2014 personal democracy (Micah is editorial director, co-founder) conf..
Designing for Online Civic Engagement
18 min – geofences
25 min – participation rather than fired up activism
31 min – popvox to go local..? it’s more for a specific problem – local is certainly in the future – really an opportunity for all of us in the civic space for us to work together..
nodes talking to each other
33 min – what engages people that don’t typically engage
35 min – Ben – build sliver that would be the iftt for geofencing… strain that civic (doesn’t really exist – i run a google search on this all the time – so that we could plug seeclickfix as the “if” piece) – or geo rss
37 min – something that doesn’t exist – world of sensors – ie: noise violations – people as relay points – sensors notifies – live person grabs data and sends to ie: seeclickfix
39 min – Micah – it has always seemed to me to be something to help people organize – rather than have something done for them or at them…
peter levine’s new book – implementation is usually directed at citizens as to what needs to be done – calls it an ease of participation… but he also wants that deliberative democracy motivation.. the ones that set the agenda.. a civic renewal
so – via cure ios city – coming from each person – each day – 24/7 – inside out ness –
hyper local ness
groups near you
find your tribe – everyday ness
53 min – playfulness to get at engagement – make a civic action playful
or – unleash natural play – then essential civic actions just happen – no extrinsic motivation needed… it is play – it becomes a game – but not front ended with agenda
the secret agenda of all this – how do we make these tools into learning tools…
so what if we don’t need that.. beyond spinach or rock
57 min – as they’re walking down the street
59 min – people w/willingness for budgeting –
or a loophole in budgets already existing. ie: public ed, health, etc
1:02 – get people talking to each other
– – – –
from the actual word post – 4 images:
Micah on big think:
More noise than signal
occasionally thwarting powerful overlords – like Egypt’s ex-dictator Hosni Mubarak – is not the same as transforming the system that confers so many advantages upon them.
We must remember that the purpose of democracy isn’t only for each of us to have our say, but to blend individual opinions into common agreements. Instead of letting our digital tools drive us in ways that exacerbate our differences, we must insist on tools that bring us together as equals to solve problems. Interestingly, the internet’s own early engineers understood this challenge very well. ‘We reject: kings, presidents and voting,’ said David Clark at the 1992 meeting of the Internet Engineering Task Force. ‘We believe in: rough consensus and running code.’
@MisifSome cranky post-primary thoughts about our so-called democracy: civichall.org/civicist/votin…The game we are all obsessing about, called voting for a leader, doesn’t work if its purpose is to actually produce a democracy, which I think most of us would define the way the ancient Greeks defined it, as a system where the people (“demos”) are in power (“cracy” = rule by).
[..]Roslyn Fuller points out in her excellent new book, Beasts and Gods: How Democracy Changed Its Meaning and Lost Its Purpose, all systems for apportioning power and representation based on voting fail at the job of choosing representative leaders. They fail for two core reasons. The first is mathematical; the second is economic.
[..]We live in a hollowed out system that calls itself a democracy, and fights over the meaning of citizenship to the point of denying it to millions of our neighbors, but that guarantees full participation to only a very few well-connected Americans.
google in ed – alphabet
#GoogleNewsInitiative in US aims to reach 1M teens with $3m grant program for training in critical thinking. Here’s a little critical thinking: there are 41M teens in USA, so any chance we can get other folks to pony this up to real scale?
Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/Mlsif/status/976124284421726208
Google/Alphabet made something in the range of $20B in profit in 2016 so it could scale these programs much bigger.
Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/Mlsif/status/976125339649781761
would rather we went deeper
New from me in @theprospect: “Here’s The Real Trouble With Tech” https://t.co/tKILWs0v0t
Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/Mlsif/status/1112702327822139393
Shoshana Zuboff’s The Age of Surveillance Capitalism—the most important book I have ever read on the intersection of technology, politics, and society—offers a radical reinterpretation of the changes the tech industry has wrought.
McNamee tried to sound an alarm with his protégé. But he was fobbed off on one of Zuck’s lieutenants, who treated his warnings as a “public relations problem.” So he decided to go public with his criticisms, teaming up with former Google ethicist Tristan Harris to create a new organization, the Center for Humane Technology, and to educate lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
Once Page and Brin agreed to start mining user data to better match ads to their interests, the company’s fortune was made.
We may individually want to escape this new enclosure movement, but Zuboff is right. We are caught in a Faustian bargain. Being connected is essential for participating in life, but the internet has been commandeered by commerce, and “commerce is now subordinated to surveillance capitalism.”
The Age of Surveillance Capitalism is not an obituary for democracy. Zuboff has provided the latticework on which to hang useful new initiatives. “**We have yet to invent the politics and new forms of collaborative action …t.. that effectively assert the people’s right to a human future,” she writes. But now that she has named the system, described it, analyzed it, and helped us understand it, we may begin to change it.
missing piece: tech as it could be (listening to every voice every day)
interview w jerry on data and tech