love.. that as long as Alan has been at this.. his comment at #reclaimopen.. at least what i hear is – that what he’s doing is hard to define .. perhaps even..
you can’t define it..
i like that definition of open.
Alan’s collection of true stories of open:
Alan lead/teaches the open digital storytelling class ds106:
This course began at the University of Mary Washington in Spring of 2010 when Jim Groom re-imagined the way the Computer Science Course in Digital Storytelling, CPSC 106, might be taught.
Digital Storytelling (also affectionately known as ds106) is an open, online course that happens at various times throughout the year at the University of Mary Washington… but you can join in whenever you like and leave whenever you need. This course is free to anyone who wants to take it, and the only requirements are a real computer, a hardy internet connection, preferably a domain of your own and some commodity web hosting, and all the creativity you can muster.
For Fall 2013, we are running an experimental open version of ds106 where… THERE IS NO TEACHER! What? How is that possible?
leading and teaching the open digital storytelling class, ds106.
Alan – exploring new options under the banner of his own creation..
notes from webinar on storytelling nov 2013:
may 21, 2014 – ttt – Alan was asked about the pillars of ds106 – along with – is it a mooc.
his answer – my paraphrase:
1. everyone has their own domain..
2. in a mooc – all headed to the same thing.. not on ds106… so proximity of others.. but each work on own art.. ness.. alongside ness
dec 2014 tweet:
TBH everything on my blog is for me; if someone else gets something out of it, nice.
fitting with document everything ness
BAMMMMM! Sound of my browser hitting a Taylor and Francis paywall on research paper. $40 to read a paper? WTF WORLD DID WE MAKE?
Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/cogdog/status/570283714120278017
Geometric progression of @vconnecting, or how @cogdog can touch u so deeply from many miles away http://t.co/ebVEKCOi3u #altc
Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/Bali_Maha/status/643472304442372096
I cannot call this relationship virtual.
It is more real than real.
And that is the “it”, Simon. There is no virtual. There is connecting, starting with one connection at a time, and geometrically growing from there.
open badges evidence via Doug:
badge evidence via Alan:
CogDogBlogged: Fences and Assurances cogdogblog.com/?p=55697
important thing is considering the dog inside the fence, and giving enough love and reasons for him to not want to jump.
There are no 100% assurable fences of protection.
part of gigapan exchange
@jimgroomThe DNS domain system as it is currently setup is brokenThe idea that everyone should have a domain for life.
how Cerf description of our current approach to web archiving as akin to creating adigital diorama: taking a two-dimensional snapshot, often by scraping sites.
kinda, think though is what an archived website looks like out of historical context
it’s like panoramas of panoramas for super Rez image. Was cool to explore, create snapshots. Been a while
I just published “I Went into the Forest” medium.com/p/i-went-into-…
And humans, at least ones from cities, seem to need to fill that sparse sound space with their own sounds, as if to comfort their own discomfort. As if they could not bear to be alone with those forest sounds.
Gardner Campbell (@GardnerCampbell) tweeted at 5:34 AM – 25 Oct 2016 :
Opening Up Attribution with Mediachain > extremely cool via @cogdog cc @RovingLibrarian @kriegtastic @anniescramble https://t.co/tUMKyDtqTw (http://twitter.com/GardnerCampbell/status/790879211305115649?s=17)
This is a case where I am so excited about something, I am not fully able to explain how it works (there is a technical-ish post), but it seems like it is using blockchain (or similar) technology to be able to track the metadata about images, even a they are remixed. In addition, this provides a way for them to provide cut and paste attribution like my little tool does.
I’m super jazzed about the features of Mediachain, and my hunch is that it will do more than images.
imagine.. putting our energy toward something that does more than images.. with a focus w/o attention to attribution for purpose of ie: micropayment ness.. thinking.. moore laughable\irrelevant law
from link in above post:
The act of seeing an image would open a gateway to an artist’s identity, the work’s history, or more works by the creator.
Imagine that, given only the anonymous Bowie GIF, you’d be able to find out that Helen Green is the artist, *send her a micropayment, see what press the image received, find more works by the artist, and contribute a statement to the chain that one of the frames was inspired by the Aladdin Sane album cover for others to see.
With Mediachain, our mission is to create world’s largest open media metadata database to preserve information about creative works. We believe this will empower creators by preserving their attribution, allow **consumers to have deeper interactions with media, and developers to build applications that ***reward creators directly.
again – rather than *micropayment/**consumers/***reward ness focus of our energies.. let’s go for connection.. to our peoples.. as the day
AUGMENTING HUMAN INTELLECT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Orientation week has begun! Engelbart Framework Project description here: https://t.co/8PNcZCbeny. Welcome from @cogdog & me: https://t.co/eUshCrHZRy . New to @hypothes_is ? Start here: https://t.co/wMiKgKY1vU . Join us! #augmentintellect #frameworkproject
Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/GardnerCampbell/status/1092587414911139840
10 min video –
Welcome to the Engelbart Framework Project
we have this idea that there’s a way to take a doc that changed the world.. but isn’t very well known.. and putting that doc (augmenting human intellect) w/in an environ that encourages really close/thoughtful engagement.. most of all an convo around doug engelbart’s ideas regarding all this tech that he helped to invent/popularize.. but along the way kind of got detached form some of those ideas.. in ways that led all the tech to not always be for the *best possible uses..t
it (annotation) does bring us back to doug’s ideas.. about collective intelligence.. people able to work together collaboratively.. his vision to harness this *collective iq and make it a real force for change.. a way of addressing these complex problems.. t.. we might be able to invent solutions faster than we invent problems..
3 min – while we’re not solving a problem.. it’s more an experience.. of using tech (he was talking about) to reveal/harness the power of collective intelligence.. what we call thought vectors and concept space
4 min – a: the power of having a convo about these papers
a fruitful search together for a bigger understanding..t
5 min – a: it’s a hard paper.. we should use these tools to get to a better understanding to make society better.. t.. employing pieces of this paper to understand it better..
6 min – he clearly anticipated there would be more building to do..t
7 min – it was the structure of the idea.. t.. that led to all the developments..
the danger is the results run away from the idea.. and get detached.. nobody to think about why anymore.. engelbart was always about being thoughtful.. why we were doing what we were doing
8 min – first week.. practice using hypothesis.. get to know others.. then 3 additional weeks.. working on annotations.. to enrich this doc w those who were there.. those following him.. and those who are new.. no prior knowledge assumed/necessary
10 min – we’re really hoping for an annotation space..
keep posted here: framework.thoughtvectors.net
annotate with us