nika on belonging ness

nika dubrovsky on belonging ness (as

via nika’s quote tweet [https://x.com/nikadubrovsky/status/2048698168209015059?s=20]:

Can we please, find a way to explain it to more people!

brown belonging lawthe opposite of belonging.. is fitting in.. true belonging doesn’t require you to change who you are.. it requires you to be who you are.. and that’s vulnerable.. –Brené Brown

legit belonging/attachment is missing piece #2.. of the 2 missing pieces we need to org around.. if we want to org around legit needs

so need 1st/most: means (nonjudgmental expo labeling) to undo hierarchical listening – so we can hear what’s already on each heart (craving of those 2 missing pieces) as global detox in order to org around legit needs

and/because..

the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]

looking into quoted tweet [https://x.com/nikadubrovsky/status/2048698168209015059?s=20]:

“The poor die defending the rules that keep them poor because they mistake obedience for belonging.” ~ George Orwell #WakeUpEverybody

poverty ness et al.. authorship et al.. anyone/anything et al.. mistaken for missing piece #2.. of the 2 missing pieces we need to org around.. are cancerous distractions if we want to org around legit needs.. if we want legit free people.. if we want the dance to dance

found via google: exact quote appears to be a summary of ie: ursula le guin‘s the dispossessed rather than actually in the book.. and also summary rather than quote of orwell’s work]

makes no diff.. point is mistaking anything for belonging ness is a cancerous distraction..

so again.. belonging/attachment is missing piece #2.. of the 2 missing pieces we need to org around.. if we want to org around legit needs

brown belonging lawthe opposite of belonging.. is fitting in.. true belonging doesn’t require you to change who you are.. it requires you to be who you are.. and that’s vulnerable.. –Brené Brown

________

to me.. nothing to date has gotten to the root of problem

legit freedom will only happen if it’s all of us.. and in order to be all of us.. has to be sans any form of measuringaccountingpeople telling other people what to do

how we gather in a space is huge.. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us..

ie: imagine if we listen to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & use that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness)

the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]

there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance.. for (blank)’s sake..

ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition

otherwise we’ll keep perpetuating the same song.. the whac-a-mole-ing ness of sea world.. of not-us ness.. of part\ial ness..  perpetuating survival triage.. for (blank)’s sake..

_______

_______

_______

_______

________

_______

nika dubrovsky ons

_______

________

_________