michel on contemp commons
michel bauwens on contemp commons theory beyond elinor ostrom
via michel fb share:
My latest substack article:
* Curated Article: Sources for Articulating a Contemporary Commons Theory Beyond Ostrom
Our aim is to reconnect with the ‘integrative’ Cosmo-Biological Traditions while fully utilizing the capacities of emerging Cosmo-Local Infrastructures
https://4thgenerationcivilization.substack.com/p/curated-article-sources-for-articulating
notes/quotes from article:
Curated Article: Sources for Articulating a Contemporary Commons Theory Beyond Ostrom – Our aim is to reconnect with the ‘integrative’ Cosmo-Biological Traditions while fully utilizing the capacities of emerging Cosmo-Local Infrastructures – jul 2024
fully utilizing emerging Cosmo-Local Infrastructures = nonjudgmental expo labeling to facil the seeming chaos of infinitesimal structures approaching the limit of structureless\ness and/or vice versa .. aka: the ginorm/small ness of the dance of legit free people
For a theory of the commons, the *go to scholar is of course Elinor Ostrom, but this historical understanding of past physical commons is just a start. What is important today is to understand how the emerging trans-local, or cosmo-local commons as we would call them, are changing the relation between the local and the non-local, the physical material world, and the relatively autonomous world of trans-local self-organizing. This requires in our view, an attention that marries attention to the physicality of our world, but also the collaborations which take place in the ‘Noosphere’, the sphere of global and local cultural exchange, which is not entirely bound by its physical location. **It really matters when you can coordinate vast and complex global projects, with people that are located in different places. If civilization is really based on the relation between the food-producing countryside, and the culture-creating cities, then it matters that we have the capacity to create cosmo-local cooperations which are relatively independent our rootedness in physical space. In this context, we may well be ***transiting to a post-civilizational phase of human history, in which human activities are not solely coordination through markets and states, but through digital commons.
*actually.. a cancerous distraction until we let go of her (all the) supposed structure ness ie: ostrom 8
**actually.. what really matters is how we gather in a space .. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us.. ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition
there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental expo labeling).. to facil a legit global detox leap.. for (blank)’s sake.. and we’re missing it
ie: imagine if we listened to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & used that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness)
until we start with itch in the soul.. we’ll just be perpetuating the supposed to projects of sea world
***again.. needs to be thru itch-in-the-soul.. otherwise.. won’t grok the garden-enough ness we need for graeber stop at enough law of the dance to dance
This bibliography doesn’t address that shift directly, but offers a structured guide to the books and analyses which we consider essential to have the intellectual tools to address them successfully.
Our guiding principle is ‘Integration’, i.e. the capacity to take a subjective-objective approach, which pays as much attention to the physicality of our world, but also to the subjective and intersubjective capacities of value-creation and culture-building and the important choices we can make as how to organize human societies. Our approach is therefore neither ‘materialist’ nor just ‘idealist’, to use the language of 19th cy philosophy, but rather cosmo-biological.
need 1st/most: means to undo our hierarchical listening to self/others/nature as global detox/re\set.. so we can org around legit needs
The Bibliography
Relational Grammars
The P2P Foundation focuses on peer to peer dynamics in networks, and on the capacity of these dynamics to create commons. The main framing uses the relational grammar of Alan Page Fiske, which has been historised by Kojin Karatani.
Alan Page Fiske: Structures of Social Life
The foundational manuscript on P2P theory, uses the relational model used by anthropologist Alan Page Fiske, to conclude that the peer to peer relational dynamic is a form on *‘non-reciprocal‘ or generalized exchange (you exchange with the totality of a resource and its community, not expecting a direct return from any individual). In Fiske’s model, it is called Communal Shareholding and it is part of a fourfold structure that **also includes Equality Matching, Authority Ranking, and Market Pricing (referring to the gift economy, redistribution according to rank, and exchange of commodities through the pricing mechanism).
if **this.. not *this
The implication is that Peer Production does not function as a Gift Economy (which corresponds to Fiske’s category called Equality Matching), as is often mistakenly claimed.
Kojin Karatani: The Structure of World History
Whereas Fiske establishes a relational grammar that one can find throughout historical periods and in every cultural sphere, Karatani historicizes their role as dominant form for particular civilizational formats, as they succeed each other through cultural and societal evolution. To be the dominant form of exchange does not mean being the only form of exchange, but it means that it is the main form, and that the other forms adapt to it.
Karatani_Kojin, is a Japanese political theorist and philosopher who is one of the co-founders of the defunct Japanese New Associationist Movement and the author of a book on the Evolution of the Structure of World History Through Modes of Production and Modes of Exchange. The book establishes a history of modes of relationship and allocation of resources (instead of the Marxist framing of ‘modes of production’ for example).
The evolution of cooperation: Multilevel Selection Theory
The commons, ‘commoning’, depends to a large degree on our capacity for cooperation and even altruism. Multi-Level Selection Theory is an adaptation of Darwinian evolutionary theory which allows for the integration of the evolutionary effects of group formation, which has been developed by David Sloan Wilson and others, for example through the Prosocial Framework which attempts to create a convergence between evolutionary theory and the findings of Elinor Ostrom.
rather.. we have the capacity.. if just set free (via unconditionality ness of left to own devices ness) for that dance to dance
1\ undisturbed ecosystem (common\ing) can happen
2\ if we create a way to ground the chaos of 8b legit free people
Interpretations of History and Human Societal Evolution
The Wave Pulse Theory of Human History
Wave Pulse theories are cyclical theories of human history, which sees societies evolving in a succession between more extractive/degradative phases, and more regenerative phases in which the commons operate as a key ‘healing’ mechanism.
For an introduction, see our article: The pulsation of the commons: The temporal context for the cosmo-local transition. By Michel Bauwens and Jose Ramos.
Karl Polanyi: The Great Transformation
A history of the emergence and evolution of capitalism, from the abolition of the basic income support system in the late 17th cy (Speenhamland system), up to 1945. Polany sees a double movement within capitalism, periods in which market power dominates and frees the economy from society (the ‘lib’ part of the pendulum), and periods when society reasserts its primacy (the ‘lab’ part of the pendulum). Technically, the ‘Nation’, i.e. the community formed under capitalism, through its mobilization against the excesses of unregulated markets, forces the State to re-regulate the Market.
Peter Pogany: Rethinking the World
Peter Pogany integrates the story of the thermodynamic basis of the human economy (matter and energy flows, subject to degradation through use), the particular forms of societal organization through global governance institutions, and the dominant mode of consciousness. He sees a succession of relatively stable systems (Global System 0, 1, and 2), which morph through intervening and inevitable chaotic transitions.
The Hypothesis of Cognitive Capitalism
Empire by Toni Negri and Michael Hardt were instrumental in mediating a type of marxist structural analysis with postmodern insights. However, I cannot say that I really adhere to the description of Empire as the new nexus of power (certainly not after the crisis of 2008). However, what is valuable in the autonomist school of thought is the stress of the agency of working and producing classes, derived from Mario Tronti, which they now call the ‘multitude’, not really an operative term either. I find their work on the commons, which they call the common, to be located at a too abstract level to be operative as well (in their book ‘Commonwealth’). It’s a bit like the work of Marx, *analytically interesting but ultimately not very predictive. However, class must remain an important structural driver of any class-based society, and cannot be ignored as an over-determining factor.
antonio negri.. michael hardt.. multitude
*?.. graeber unpredictability/surprise law et al
Somewhat related are the different schools of thought that focus on the hypothesis of Cognitive Capitalism, building on insights from the Regulation School, i.e. Yann-Moulier Boutang, Mazzarato, Andreas Fumagalli, Carlo Vercellone. I believe they offer a lot of insights into the current stage of capitalism. See also Mackenzie Wark’s Hacker Manifesto, a true masterpiece although I disagree with its main theses.
intellectness as cancerous distraction we can’t seem to let go of.. there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental expo labeling).. to facil a legit global detox leap.. for (blank)’s sake.. and we’re missing it
Methodological Issues
In Summary: The Place of the Integral Approach in P2P Theory, it discusses:
- Ken Wilber’s AQAL approach
- Roy Bhaskar’s Four-planar Social Being
- Toni Negri’s multitudes and singularities
- The Intersubjective Relational Typology of Alan Page Fiske
- Multi-Evolutionism or Non-Linear Evolution Theory
- Archdisciplinarity; Archtheory
P2P Theory as a Emancipatory Version of Integral Theory
Specific note to the intellectual background of Michel Bauwens:
At its very origin, the founding of the P2P Foundation as a project was linked to a progressive critique of the Integral Theory as developed by Ken Wilber, and used, and still uses, the AQAL framework as a non-reductionist framework to look at human history. It could be linked to the early work of the II-Politics group (before the founding of the Integral Institute) in the late 90s, with people like Michael Brooks and Greg Wilpert, Ray Harris, Mark Edwards, etc.. but with a specific critique of what I then believed was an unwelcome neoconservative turn by Ken Wilber, as expressed in his novel Boomeritis. I (Michel Bauwens), did not properly understand that Wilber’s understanding of political correctness was an early recognition of the fundamental dangers posed by identitarian politics. The P2P Foundation detached itself from Wilber then to take on a much broader interest in the whole tradition of integral thinkers, including the work of Jean Gebser, Roy Bhaskar (I feel very close to Critical Realism as the proper epistemology), Aurobindo, but also a wider variety of integrative meta-historians (see the book by Sohail Inatullah on the subject), such as Sarkar, Sorokin, and others. This remains a core interest to this day.
This is a good intro to the integral approach, as it inter-relates three complex adaptive systems of
1) the climate and the environment;
2) human societies and culture
3) the mental constellations.
Note that our wiki has a separate section on Integral Theory
Critical Realism as Epistemological Approach
See: Critical Realism:
CR tries to steer a middle way, an integrative way, between the objectivity claims of modern science, and the critical approaches before, during and after postmodernism, i.e. it updates epistemology and truth claims taken into account some of the justified critiques of the postmodern period.
“CR holds that the world is characterized by a kind of duality in which (intransitive) objects (in a general categorical and dispositional sense) have their own existence (and agency) outside of human knowledge and interpretation, but can only be known in their specific contents, rich textures, and nuances in and through (transitive) scientific inquiry and human interpretation/construction.”
Organicism and the Cosmobiological Tradition
“Rational human free agency is an immanent structure of essentially embodied conscious, intentional, caring human animal mind; essentially embodied, conscious, intentional, caring human animal mind is an immanent structure of organismic life; and organismic life is an immanent structure of spatiotemporally asymmetric, non-equilibrium matter and/or energy flows. Each more complex structure is metaphysically continuous with, and embeds, all of the less complex structures.”
Transmodernism
This is tentative, I am not yet convinced by metamodernist approaches, but I believe the P2P approach is probably best linked to transmodern approaches. For an introduction to these approaches, see: Visions of Transmodernity: A New Renaissance of our Human History? By Irena Ateljevic.
See: P2P Theory’s Positioning and the Transmodern Approaches
P2P Theory as ‘Low Theory’
Low theory is described as an approach by McKenzie Wark in Molecular Red. This means that the aim of P2P Theory is not a grand unified theory of history, but a contextual theory-building approach with a single focus: understanding the emergence and role of peer to peer dynamics and commoning. The criteria to be covered in our wiki for example, is that it has to exist, at the very least in prototypal form. Thus, we aim to collect data and knowledge about how P2P and the Commons affect human society (and the broader web of life), in every single domain, looking at them as seed forms that carry new logics of possibility that could evolve from social innovation status to a normative and institutional part of society; the basis must be factual and revised if facts turned out to be untrue or no longer valid; the theory must be coherent in all its part, and third, what is the broadest integrative and emancipatory interpretation that is consistent with these facts and their coherence.
in order to see common\ing need to let go of history ness.. and understanding ness..
Technological Theories
I have found Andrew Feenberg’s approach appealing, as it combines technology critique, but keeps the avenues open for constructive social change:
- Technology, Modernity, and Democracy. Essays by Andrew Feenberg. Rowman and Littlefield, 2018
Theories of the Commons
Elinor Ostrom: Governing the Commons
The P2P Foundation first phase of research was directed towards the peer production of ‘immaterial’ goods, such as free software, open design and shared knowledge, i.e. also sometimes called open source production, which operates around digital knowledge-based commons; the second phase was dedicated to urban commons, i.e. the mutualization of physical resources; and the third phase is dedicated to actual physical production, what we call Cosmo-Localization or “Cosmo-Local Production”. In this context, the pioneering work of Elinor Ostrom, which focused on the multi-millennial history of natural resource commons (mainly but not exclusively), is of course a very important reference.
The Ecological turn: commons economics are bio-social-physical economics
We started our ‘ecological turn’ in 2017, with the publication of our own report, The Thermodynamic Efficiencies of Peer Production. Looking at the insights of biophysical economics, and the discussions in the degrowth movements, we came to the conclusion that mutualization is one of the key strategic priorities to reduce the human footprint, while maintaining complex societal systems. So we focus on the mutualization of urban and rural provisioning systems, striving for Perma-Circularity and a Factor 20 Reduction in energy usage.
Kate Raworth’s synthesis on ecological and social economics, i.e. Doughnut Economics
Kate Raworth has produced an excellent synthesis of the earlier work of the Stockholm Resilience Institute and other ecological scholars pointing out the dangers of overstepping the planetary boundaries of crucial natural cycles. The Doughnut model combines a vision of the limited planetary resources, with a vision of fulfilling the needs of that part of humanity that doesn’t have access to the basic provisioning systems. Our report P2P Accounting for Planetary Survival, which she foreworded, looks at which global cyber-physical infrastructure, could help the worldwide coordination of production for human needs, without overstepping those boundaries, by looking at innovative accounting prototypes which include these thermodynamic limitations in its contributory and flow-based supply chains, using shared distributed ledgers.
Jason W. Moore on Capitalism in the Web of Life
This book is the state of the art of world-ecological analysis. Capitalism exists because its sphere of commodity prices also uses the appropriation of the ‘Four Cheaps’ (labor, food, energy, resources) in frontiers that are not subject yet to its own rules. But as these frontiers exhaust themselves because of over-exploitation, new frontiers are needed to restart the cycle. Moore insists on a view that doesn’t separate humans from nature, but sees historical natures as coproduced by human and extra-human nature.
The participatory turn in human consciousness: Jorge Ferrer and John Heron
The P2P Foundation’s philosophical basis is an integral/integrative, participatory and relational ontology, based on a critical realist approach.
Jean Gebser: The Ever-Present Origin
“The P2P Foundation’s founding was originally a left-integral impulse, i.e. an attempt to renew the emancipatory tradition for the networked age, inspired to a certain degree by integral theories and thinking. One of our sources was Jean Gebser and his history of forms of human consciousness, and their successive mutations that also correspond to types of civilizations. Peter Pogany has worked on a synthesis between thermodynamic realities, socio-technical infrastructures of human civilizations, and the dominant forms of consciousness that accompany them.”. Ken Wilber’s AQAL approach was also influential, and Michel Bauwens had studied Wilber for about 8 years. At the time of the founding of the P2P Foundation however, Bauwens had already developed a critique of Ken Wilber’s work, while still broadly believing in the importance of a non-reductionist and integrative approach. A third influence is the Critical Realism of Roy Bhaskar.
roy bhaskar – critical realism
_______
via tweet [https://x.com/mbauwens/status/1820069929703637212]:
This is …
* A Structured Bibliography on P2P and the Commons
https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Structured_Bibliography_on_P2P_and_the_Commons
I produced this in 2019,and it represents at least a decade of selecting the best essays on the joint thematics of P2P and the Commons.
It has the following modules:
* 1: The anthropology of peer to peer and the commons
* 2: The Commons as a mode of production / the commons as economic system
* 3: The Institutional, technical and societal logic of the commons
* 4: P2P as transformative emancipatory movement
* 5: Urban Transformations
* 6: P2P Theory as Theory
In the comments below, I present each section with a selected essay, to give you a flavor of what you can find.
_______
______
______
_______
________
be you. 