brett (s) on baby care ness

[note: this is actually quite huge.. it’s about the deeper (deep dive) structural element we keep missing.. just taking advantage of brett’s comments to restate it to myself – and anyone listening]

brett scott on baby care ness

via brett (s) on david ness page (all quotes below from his video embedded/linked on page):

anthro starts with recognition that person can’t exist apart from group… network proceeds individual.. care a basic.. ie: babies can’t survive.. require relationships to other people

key point though.. that we keep missing.. and so the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness.. ie: in a legit/loving/free home.. that baby’s care is unconditional

sounds very contradictory.. how to take care but also leave to own devices.. but that’s the dance.. and the not yet scrambled ness that we keep disturbing.. the craziness we can’t seem to let go enough to see.. that the 2 missing pieces have to happen in sync.. just like the all of us ness has to happen in sync.. all of this leads to (and what we found from on the ground ness deep dive) the need for a global detox leap.. for (blank)’s sake

[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]

ie: humanity needs a leap.. to get back/to simultaneous spontaneity .. simultaneous fittingness.. everyone in sync.. the dance

otherwise we keep perpetuating ie: parents are the first ness et al; it’s about how to listen deep enough.. all at the same time.. rather than keep disturbing .. the dance

for that.. need 1st/most: means (nonjudgmental expo labeling) to undo hierarchical listening – so we can hear what’s already on each heart as global detox in order to org around legit needs

before anyone can be individual.. have to be born and cared for

for much of human history didn’t imagine you could walk off on own.. think we can now.. just still not true

10 min – via econ ness vision to walk off and leave society.. (now) seen as deep level structural problem/bug

11 min – econ taking theory and projecting it backward .. where it never existed..

actually to me.. even deeper.. and since that day..

ie: two books ness et al

______

whole current spiel.. all from on the ground ness deep dive:

nothing to date (ever since that day) has gotten to the root of problem

legit freedom will only happen if it’s all of us.. and in order to be all of us.. has to be sans any form of measuringaccountingpeople telling other people what to do

how we gather in a space is huge.. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us..

ie: imagine if we listen to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & use that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness)

the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]

there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance

ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition

otherwise we’ll keep perpetuating the same song.. the whac-a-mole-ing ness of sea world.. of not-us ness.. of part\ial ness..  perpetuating survival triage.. for (blank)’s sake..

note: on survival ness: survival is a means to survive things as they are.. so to me.. not a legit alt.. it’s triage.. perpetuating survival triage.. so a temp band aide per se.. that will /can help now.. but only for short term.. because it still doesn’t get to the root of the problem.. so it won’t offer/lead-to legit change/life/freedom.. et al.. so.. to me.. it’s still a cancerous distraction to the dance

to me.. the taking care of baby ness as we do it .. as we’ve done it since that day.. is about survival ness.. not life over survival ness.. because we’re all (and have been since forever) in sea world

we need to take note from hari rat park law et al

_____

_____

_____

_____

______