askew unconditional law

we belong without condition.. for without this we are always fighting to be enough.. and under this circumstance there is no peace..

-Nic Askew

askew unconditional law: we belong without condition.. for without this we are always fighting to be enough.. and under this circumstance there is no peace.. – Nic Askew

this is ginormous

commoning has to be unconditional or it’s tragedy/non-commoning

and great news.. askew bones law – it’s already in our bones

________

from Nic‘s feb 17 2020 newsletter [http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1101043267358&ca=91f2e034-12c6-41b5-bd81-3fa2c9569c36]

The point of this work has always been to demonstrate that we belong without condition. For without this we are always fighting to be enough. And under this circumstance there is no peace. Nothing in respect to this work has changed in 15 years. But my knowing of how one arrives at where one has always been has deepened. Quickened even.

_________

brown belonging lawthe opposite of belonging.. is fitting in.. true belonging doesn’t require you to change who you are.. it requires you to be who you are.. and that’s vulnerable.. –Brené Brown

the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

[‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows]

there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance.. for (blank)’s sake..

ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition

otherwise we’ll keep perpetuating the same song.. the whac-a-mole-ing ness of sea world.. of not-us ness.. of part\ial ness..  perpetuating survival triage.. for (blank)’s sake..

_________

supposed to’s.. killing us

still.. enough..

unconditional

let go

why not yet

pearson unconditional law

missing piece

________

_________

laws\ish