(suggested) scientific method

(suggested) scientific method:

1. what’s that

2. how does it work

3. yeah.. why

what if.. most all our efficiencies (via scientific method et al), [ie: creation of medicines, ammunitions, tools of measurement, …], are more a necessity of a people gone blind to what matters most (by jargon/verbiage/academia-speak of authoritative in-the-know-ness), and are thus, in that blindness/numbness/deadness creating problems that wouldn’t have occurred if we were simple awake/alive.

what if.. it’s the belief in the possibility of proving of things that’s getting in the way of us being.

wikipedia small

The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. The Oxford English Dictionary defines the scientific method as: “a method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.”

The chief characteristic which distinguishes the scientific method from other methods of acquiring knowledge is that scientists seek to let reality speak for itself, supporting a theory when a theory’s predictions are confirmed and challenging a theory when its predictions prove false.

Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses via predictions which can be derived from them. These steps must be repeatable to guard against mistake or confusion in any particular experimenter.

iterating detox ness – our need to start everyday anew.. to question everything..  to have the bravery to change our mind..

Scientific inquiry is generally intended to be as objective as possible in order to reduce biased interpretations of results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive, and share all data and methodology so they are available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, giving them the opportunity to verify the results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical measures of the reliability of the data to be established (when data is sampled or compared to chance).

if you think you can measure it.. perhaps that’s a sign that it’d not real .. alive.. legit.. no?

often.. once we believe we’ve proved something.. we stop listening..

and then there’s the whole realm of pay wall ness.. which is so not full disclosure. on our ongoing need to listen deeply.. to the unlikely.. rhizomatic/stigmergic expertise ness..


arguing w/a scientist – via Seth


The act of being a scientist is the commitment to the scientific method, a series of hypotheses, tests and re-evaluations. When you make better science, the scientist’s previous opinion doesn’t matter, not if she’s being a scientist.


Science has started to ask questions that may not be able to be answered by the scientific method -Gerry Gilmore #100yearsfromnow

Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/xiaosquared/status/673119593691529216


scientific method (suggested) – i think the thinking on this page is what got me going long ago on sci method ness


thoughts scribbled in the middle of the night ness…



from Gabor Maté‘s scattered:


the quintessential achievement of western civilization, the scientific method, has come to be interpreted so narrowly that it has been used to exclude essential knowledge human beings have worked and studied and struggle over hundreds of generations to gain: the knowledge that we are not just the molecules that accidentally have come together to form our bodies, the thoughts that temporarily engage our mind, the feelings that agitate or soothe us from one moment to the next..  so ‘scientific’ have we become, that our science has come to ignore or deny the work and experience of the greatest teachers of humankind..


via Elon Musk


The scientific method is a phrase Musk uses often when asked how he came up with an idea, solved a problem or chose to start a business. Here’s how he defines it for his purposes, in mostly his own words:

1. Ask a question.

2. Gather as much evidence as possible about it.

3. Develop axioms based on the evidence, and try to assign a probability of truth to each one.

4. Draw a conclusion based on cogency in order to determine: Are these axioms correct, are they relevant, do they necessarily lead to this conclusion, and with what probability?
5. Attempt to disprove the conclusion. Seek refutation from others to further help break your conclusion.
6. If nobody can invalidate your conclusion, then you’re probably right, but you’re not certainly right.

“That’s the scientific method,” Musk concludes. “It’s really helpful for figuring out the tricky things.”

But most people don’t use it, he says. They engage in wishful thinking. They ignore counterarguments. They form conclusions based on what others are doing and aren’t doing. The reasoning that results is “It’s true because I said it’s true,” but not because it’s objectively true.


from Jeremy Heimans and Henry Timms new power:


old power values.. came from a world w clear boundaries between ‘us’ and ‘them’.. where only the lab coated and credentialed were equipped to solve the mysteries of the cosmos.. as one leading scientist explained, the resistance to open innovation ‘is really intrinsic, the history of the scientific method goes against it.. in our training  trying to solve problems in the scientific method was: i take in all this info, i synthesise it, i do analysis, and i come to some conclusion and so to reach out to other people to solve it, it’s like cheating’

scientific method and cheating