distribution ness
distribution: the action of sharing something out among a number of recipients
so by this defn.. has to be a form of people telling other people what to do.. someone has to be deciding how to ‘share it out’.. deciding what others’ needs/desires are
sharing: give a portion of (something) to another or others
and so too.. there must be some measuring things ness going on
we need the unconditional part of left to own devices ness .. sans sans any form of measuring, accounting, people telling other people what to do for the dance to dance
adding page via michel bauwens tweet [https://x.com/mbauwens/status/1844280950370586635]:
Book : Cooperation: A Political, Economic, and Social Theory. By Bernard E. Harcourt. Columbia University Press, 2024
“Bernard E. Harcourt develops a transformative theory and practice that builds on worldwide models of successful cooperation. He identifies the most promising forms of cooperative initiatives and then distills their lessons into an integrated framework: Coöperism. This is a political theory grounded on recognition of our interdependence. It is an *economic theory that can ensure equitable distribution of wealth. Finally, it is a social theory that **replaces the punishment paradigm with a cooperation paradigm.”
*not legit interdependence (aka: not the dance) if any form of measuring, accounting, people telling other people what to do
**cooperation: the process of working together to the same end.. assistance, especially by ready compliance with requests
public consensus always oppresses someone(s)
to me.. equity means everyone getting a go.. and in order to get a legit go.. it needs to be sans any form of m\a\p
it doesn’t matter what defn you use for equity.. if there is distribution ness.. there is some form of accounting ness.. a form of not trusting the dance enough to see/try the unconditional part of left to own devices ness
so.. from that distribution ness.. people end of with finite set of choices ness
legit freedom will only happen if it’s all of us.. and in order to be all of us.. has to be sans any form of measuring, accounting, people telling other people what to do
how we gather in a space is huge.. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us..
ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition
there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental expo labeling).. to facil a legit global detox leap.. for (blank)’s sake.. and we’re missing it
ie: imagine if we listened to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & used that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness)
i know the argument of we have scarce/limited resources.. so this whatever ness is literally impossible .. but that is based on the myth of tragedy and lord.. and not trusting that if people are legit free.. that they would grok garden-enough ness (graeber stop at enough law et al)
________
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
______
be you. 