daniel on expo tech

daniel schmachtenberger on expo tech – in series about searching for 3rd attractor

third attractor: [Those of us who are discontent with the current progress and direction of the world envision more positive possibilities for our future. Collectively this is known as the “Third Attractor”, not catastrophe, not dystopia, but something more promising.]

via michel bauwens fb share of 3 hr video – [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XCXvzQdcug] – In Search of the Third Attractor, Daniel Schmachtenberger (part 1):

not listening to it.. looked at contents listed.. and listened at 45 min.. EXPONENTIAL DESTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY: 00:45:02:

46 min – we hear the democratization of tech power is a good thing.. the democratization of catastrophic power.. not necessarily a good thing.. tech that can be catastrophic.. *being radically decentralized.. that is not monitor-able.. or have a very hard time being able to enforce agreements.. creates radical fragility in the world..  t

*unless we use those radical decentralized tech in legit diff way.. (3rd attractor?) so we can let go enough to see what legit free people are like.. ie: infinitesimal structures approaching the limit of structureless\ness and/or vice versa .. aka: ginorm/small ness.. via ai as nonjudgmental expo labeling

huge.. and we’re missing it

47 min – *how does world make it thru decentralized catastrophic capability..t **catastrophe weapons for anybody that wants them capability.. t

*need 1st/most: means to undo our hierarchical listening to self/others/nature for global detox/reset so we can org around legit needs

imagine if we listened to the itch-in-8b-souls 1st thing everyday & used that data to connect us (tech as it could be.. ai as augmenting interconnectedness as nonjudgmental expo labeling)

**again.. the above.. because ie: gershenfeld something else law

long version – (gershenfeld something else law) neil gershenfeld at 9 (of 11) min talk on edge site: [http://edge.org/conversation/personal-fabrication]:

9 min… on pentagon trying to improve defense:

….possibly one of the best/most significant impacts of tech is not a better weapon to win a war but tech that gives people something else to do.  .. there will always be bad people that want to use best available means to shoot at each other but the roll of tech in giving everybody else something else to do – as a cost benefit trade off – may be one of the best military investments – and the generals got that.. but not clear what office in the pentagon is the office of preventive technology

freeing us – all – up to be usefully/happily preoccupied

something else to do – the best protection/benefit/betterness.. for the entire world.. is for each person to be/become themselves.. perhaps because it’s then we become .. unoffendable

_________

________

_______

_______

________

________

________