as it could be doc

as it could be ness on google doc:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aJbg_8BADeHehRB3Af2xLCyVYhQM3vKhHZWrB2Hd3wI/edit

________

as it could be

perhaps what the world needs most (more than figuring out knowledge/coordination/planning/whatever) is the energy of 8b alive people.. and trusting that that would be enough. so perhaps what we should/could be using tech/ai for is augmenting our interconnectedness (to self and others and nature)

we have seen advances in every aspect of our lives except our humanity– Luma Mufleh

why (tech as it could be)..

1\ there’s no way we (a person) can listen to all the voices

2\ trying to (listen to all the voices) is one of our biggest.. shiny ness .. problems.. our focus should be to listen to our own heart/voice.. otherwise we’re spinning our wheels listening to not-us voices.. (reason for 2 conversations as infrastructure)

3\ even if you could listen.. ie: hear me now.. the infra/system is set up that first i need to be speaking your language.. which takes up my day.. so that by the time i get to your language.. i’m never speaking that original voice/message anyway.. (reason for idio-jargon‘d self-talk infra)

4\ even if you could listen.. ie: hear me now.. our intoxicated default is to judge/hate/whatever.. rather than just take in the input and try to connect it.. (reason for simple mech infra)

and so.. we need a tech to listen to all the voices .. unconditionally.. w/o judgment.. and facil that

and it matters that all the voices are coming from alive people.. so.. the mech/infra has to also wake/detox us up

how (tech as it could be)..

brief summary: tech listens for key words from daily self-talk/curiosities.. then matches local people daily via those key words

more description linked here: using 2 conversations as infrastructure.. and believing that what is lacking in all of us.. and so what we should/could focus on.. are two basic needs (attachment and authenticity) 

safety/rivalry/whatever.. would/could all become irrelevant if we make sure that 1\ everyone (has to be all of us) is included .. and that it is done 2\ sans money (any form of measuring/accounting).. this is something we’ve not yet tried.. but we do have the means – ie: gershenfeld something else law et al

balancing out needs/resources.. would depend on our ability to trust that the dance of 8b truly free people.. (an *undisturbed ecosystem) would be enough

*in undisturbed ecosystems ..the average individual, species, or population, left to its own devices, behaves in ways that serve and stabilize the whole..’ –Dana Meadows

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nCM7Exy_UThr0x5xwABajcG183UrxRgILgQnEU8NJ10/edit#

_______

________