the unconditional part of left to own devices ness
[aka: the whatever ness of a legit sabbatical ish transition.. so the dance can dance]
[note: may not look like left-to-own-devices .. since all have same hoola hoop.. but imagining the hoola hoop as our econ – bachelard oikos law – that uncovers/protects/renews our missing pieces]
looks like need to pay to embed slideshare on wordpress now?.. [https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/unconditional-part-of-left-to-own-devices-pdf/271410471]
forgot i already did one.. no embed on top of page threw me.. so here’s a take two slidedeck: [https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/the-unconditional-part-of-left-to-own-devices-take-two/282509204]
and here’s a link to take two slidedeck via google slides.. that i can’t seem to embed either.. oof [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vRLnb4mM7KX5DoAqhIM1rtTdnp4415iWaX6fzVyXgnA2DELinV-T9_NEWzgFxQI70GtiuyMue7SSKDe/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000]
the unconditional part of left to own devices ness is something we’ve not yet tried and so we keep perpetuating tragedy of the non common et al
in particular..
the key element: getting a person to believe they really can do whatever they want..no strings
the trick: hastening that key element for everyone..in sync
[adding page so i can just tag it .. rather than copy and pasting above phrase from the dance and sabbatical ish transition pages]
huge..
as it’s what we/me have been focusing on the last 15 ish years (ie: on the ground ness).. the means/conditions we need to give that a legit try
image could seem like perpetuating ‘norm‘ ness.. since all have hoola hoops.. so imagining hoola hoop reps the a & a.. the bachelard oikos law.. et al
________
aka: the dance
David Graeber: “Everyday we wake up and collectively make a world together; but which one of us, left to our own devices, would ever decide they wanted to make a world like this one?”
‘in undisturbed ecosystem ..the average individual, .. left to its own devices, behaves in ways that serve and stabilize the whole..’ –Dana Meadows
we need to give that dance a go
‘left to own devices’ ness means letting go enough to be legit unconditional
pearson unconditional law: what is it about loving each other unconditionally that scares us so much – come sunday (pearson)
how we gather in a space is huge.. need to try spaces of permission where people have nothing to prove to facil curiosity over decision making.. because the finite set of choices of decision making is unmooring us.. keeping us from us..
ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition
________
_______
1\ undisturbed ecosystem (common\ing) can happen
2\ if we create a way to ground the chaos of 8b legit free people
______
_______
______
on all the cons of whatever ness:
from mannin’s bread and roses p 80: There is no reason for giving a denial to any person, since there is such plenty of everything among them; and there is no danger of a man’s asking for more than he needs; they have no inducements to do this, since they are sure that they shall always be supplied
dostoyevsky bad people law et al
________
______
______
______
be you. 