the labeling part of nonjudgmental exponential labeling

just a note to clarify – after adding hans-georg on profilicity..

my (warning ness) distinction between his profile (or any form of naming the colour ness.. et al).. and the labeling part of nonjudgmental expo labeling:

keeping it short –

the ‘labeling’ part of nel is 1\ unconditional via idiosyncratic jargon ness et al and 2\ ever changing (the it is me freedom) via the exponential part

so if any ‘labeling’ that is nonexponential and nonjudgemental isn’t free enough to set us free

because to me.. in order to get us back/to us (imagine a turtle et al) we need tech as softwave ness to undo our hierarchical listening so we can org around legit needs (aka: missing piece/need #1 – authenticity and missing piece/need #2 – attachment

if the ‘labeling’ (that i highly criticize ongoingly) is itself changing at an exponential rater.. aka: approaching the limit of the infinitesimal.. to me that would hasten our detox enough so that we could be doing it in sync

since we need all of us from the get go for the dance to dance

findings from on the ground ness deep dive on why we need tech w/o judgment

ie: the dance won’t dance unless/until it’s 1\ all of us 2\ legit free

nothing to date (ever since that day) has gotten to that root of problem

legit freedom will only happen if it’s all of us.. and in order to be all of us.. has to be sans any form of measuring, accounting, people telling other people what to do

i think nonjudgmental expo labeling is our best try to get to the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness.. to get to the dance

______

_____

_____

_____