michel on undisturbed ecosystem

michel bauwens on undisturbed ecosystem via reply to quote tweet [https://x.com/mbauwens/status/1967459485825556693]:

it’s a shame though, no undisturbed ecosystem has ever existend, and can’t exist. Under capitalist conditions, the undisturbed individual most certainly will not serve the whole. So what then, do we do ?

quote tweet [https://x.com/monk51295/status/1967234551635497178]:

‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows

the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

tweet quote tweeted []:

Could it be somehow compared with this book?

dana meadows.. thinking in systems.. et al

the dance

my reply to michel [https://x.com/monk51295/status/1967475380429988334]:

‘and can’t exist’

perhaps.. until now.. now we have the means to facil the seeming chaos of a legit global detox leap

because it hasn’t existed.. we don’t believe it can.. but not believing it can doesn’t mean it can’t

that it hasn’t existed to date.. is why we keep perpetuating myth of tragedy (of the non common) and lord (of the flies) et al.. we keep not letting go enough to see (the unconditional part of left to own devices ness)

hari rat park law et al

findings from on the ground ness:

1\ undisturbed ecosystem (common\ing) can happen

2\ if we create a way to facil the seeming chaos of 8b legit free people

there’s a legit use of tech (nonjudgmental exponential labeling) to facil the seeming chaos of a global detox leap/dance.. for (blank)’s sake..

ie: whatever for a year.. a legit sabbatical ish transition

otherwise we’ll keep perpetuating the same song.. the whac-a-mole-ing ness of sea world.. of not-us ness