now seeing basecamp as iteration of app.. chaos organized.. for 7 bill. as the day.
story starting at 10 min – part resonating at 11 min – on diff of being offered sev options (overwhelmed).. & being asked.. what do you want (start from your itch).. – Nate
ie: to singularity.. and to ginormously small… to app chip update..
the convo on having choices (no matter how many).. vs.. what do you want. (no matter how offbeat sounding)…
can now facilitate that craziness of singularity/everything is possible… getting us back to the quiet in our own room/heart/echo chamber… daily
15 min – Jason on explaining the project – as standard w/o human intervention.. see sample with content that might not be relevant to you.. ie: looks generic i can’t imagine myself in this generic thing… then once you get rid of sample project.. not a good job at suggesting steps.. don’t want to invite people to something empty… new version – onboarding process… optional tour.. explaining big/small pic.. people do want to know how to use something.. no shame in telling them
17:30 min – i don’t want to tell people what to do because the product is so simple they can figure it out.. it’s not about how simple the project is it’s about how much time someone has and what their motivation/intention is.. the product might be simple but if they can’t imagine themselves in it because they don’t know where to start.. that doesn’t make product simple because of simple tools.. how do they work together.. what’s right thing to do first.. taking someone thru a path i think is the better approach.. still working on that…
18 min – what i hear from people all the time is – am i using this right… that’s a red flag…
so – perhaps people are detoxed enough… so that begs to be part of the path.. ie: self-talk, find path/people
19 min – how best to integrate expertise… – Nate
again – use all of us.. but need/begs to do this first: free art ists
20 min – on having to know your customer – but how vastly different people are.. how to know 7 billion people..
nov 2015 – talk at websummit 2015 – dhh
Let’s start at the bottom: People who make lots of little bets on many potential unicorns have christened themselves angels. Angels? Really? You’ve plucked your self-serving moniker from the parables of a religion that specifically and explicitly had its head honcho throw the money men out of the temple and proclaim a rich man less likely to make it into heaven than a camel through a needle’s eye. Okay then!
And that’s just the first step of the pipeline. If you’re capable of stringing enough buzzwords about disruption and sufficient admiration for its holy verses, like software eating the world, and an appropriate yearning for the San Franciscan Mecca, you too can get to advance in this multi-level investment scheme.
Don’t just accept this definition of “success” because that’s what everyone is cheering for at the moment.
Well, to then answer the question, “why are you here?”, you might as well make it literal. Why are you HERE. Dublin, Ireland, The European Union? Don’t you know that surely the fastest and probably the only way to join the uniclub is to rent a mattress in the shifty part of San Francisco where the rent is only $4,000/month?
Hey, shit, I don’t know which mud is going to stick to the wall, so please, for the sake of my six-pack of Rolexes, keep throwing!!
This whole conference is utterly unrepresentative when it comes to the business world at large! That’s why the mindfuck is so complete. ..
Don’t listen! They’ve convinced the world that San Francisco is its primary hope for progress and that while you should emulate it where you can, that emulation is going to be a shallow one. ..
They’ve trained the media like obedient puppies to celebrate their process and worship their vocabulary. ..
But in the end, they’re money lenders.