jordan on levin’s platonic space ness

jordan (green)hall on michael levin‘s platonic space ness

via tweet [https://x.com/jgreenhall/status/2099410617316614269?s=20]:

Thinking about @drmichaellevin paper and this quote: “ What all of these examples have in common is that cells work to create a specific structure (even though no individual cell knows what, for example, a finger is or how many there should be) and stop when the anatomical goal has been reached—the key hallmark of this pattern homeostasis process.” In the context of AI development. If Michael is right, there is a continuum to intelligence and all intelligence is collective intelligence and there will be a mechanism independent movement towards some structure followed by homeostasis.

or perhaps the dance has nothing to do with intell

‘in an undisturbed ecosystem ..the individual left to its own devices.. serves the whole’ –dana meadows

perhaps intellect ness is also a cancerous distraction that we can’t seem to let go of.. so we keep disturbing that dance

ie.. from michael (levin) on platonic space ness page:

yeah.. i don’t know.. from what i got from his paper et al.. was that with his intell ness and pattern ness and truth ness .. he is assuming a rigidity that unsettles me (of math and men ness always measuring things).. after what i’ve seen/heard (from on the ground ness deep dive et al) .. (ie: graeber can’t know law.. graeber unpredictability/surprise law.. graeber violence/quantification law.. et al) .. to me.. any ‘certainty/intell/truth/pattern ness’ blinds/disturbs us from the dance.. keeps on perpetuating not-us ness.. and so to me .. this is why we need tech w/o judgment to facil the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness

______

______

_____

_____

_____

_____

______