boyle hypocrisy law

Being a hypocrite is always my highest ideal, as it means I’ve set higher standards for myself to strive for than I’m achieving at any one moment.



All power to my dear friend #MarkBoyle, following where his principles lead, as ever:… Look fwd to hanging out in Feb


MarK Boyle

David Fleming




finding resonance with Mark‘s comment.. (even though.. and perhaps because.. my heart bleeds for eudaimoniative surplus)

update from shaun


He nicked that one from David Fleming, to be fair! Should never have given him that book.. ;D

But what is the alternative, if we are mindful of the consequences of our actions? How can we live lives of full joy, without sacrifice, guilt or wilful ignorance? For me, what works is letting the two sides of my self talk to each other. The part that desires the Magnum and the part that does not desire the consequences. Rather than choosing between them, I let them talk it out. Surprisingly, perhaps, they seem to come to an agreement quickly enough.

nice..self-talk .. toward eudaimonia..

Well, when faced with accusations of hypocrisy, I turn to my dear late mentor David Fleming’s just-published masterpiece Lean Logic:

If an argument is a good one, dissonant deeds do nothing to contradict it. In fact, the hypocrite may have something to be said for him…

There is no reason why he should not argue for standards better than he manages to achieve in his own life. Indeed, it would be worrying if his ideals were not better than the way he lives.


if our response to this is to withdraw from the discussion until we have “set our own house in order” and developed a perfect lifestyle, we will disappear from the conversation altogether, taking the ideals we believe in along with us.


In truth, accusations of hypocrisy themselves tend to be rather hypocritical—if no hypocrites were permitted to hold opinions, there would likely be no opinions at all.


Or as Russell Brand pithily put it: “When I was poor and I complained about inequality people said I was bitter. Now I’m rich and I complain about inequality they say I’m a hypocrite. I’m beginning to think they just don’t want inequality on the agenda.”



accusations of hypocrisy should be seen for what they generally are: irrelevant. While a friend or your own conscience might helpfully challenge you to perceive ways in which your lifestyle could better match your aims, an adversary just wants to distract attention from the truth you speak. Don’t take such accusations to heart, and don’t let them distract you from the work of your heart. Failure to live up to a truth doesn’t make it any less true, less worth striving for, or less worth defending.


Once we hear all the voices inside us—and set aside unfriendly ones accusing us of hypocrisy—we can start to live a full expression of who we are; whoever we are, and whatever others think of it.


The energy those old conflicts were sucking from our souls is released to the part of us that is always yearning to live and explore, always striving to create the next most beautiful version of what we can be, always seeking to uncover deeper truths and unleash new energies and potentials.


And this is the very undeath that our native culture seems to specialise in, as it urges us perpetually towards joyless, guilt-riddled consumption. As it values the number of breaths in our life far more than the amount of life in our breaths. As it places inside its children values that can turn the desire to heal our world into a burden of guilt and self-denial so heavy that the decision to buy an ice cream becomes exhausting. We carry the wetiko culture within us.



So let the different voices in your heart converse and converge. ..create a life that you choose wholeheartedly. This is utopia today, and perhaps the only utopia there has ever been.

utopia ness

imagine .. eagle and condor ness ie: hosting-life-bits via self-talk as data .. toward eudaimoniative surplus..