superorganism ness

[disclaimer: to me this misses the point of organism as fractal ness et al.. and so .. keeping us from the thing we’ve not yet tried/seen: the unconditional part of left to own devices ness of an undisturbed ecosystem]

via wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superorganism]:

A superorganism, or supraorganism, is a group of synergetically interacting organisms of the same species. A community of synergetically interacting organisms of different species is called a holobiont.

to me.. if pointing out same/different species.. already a cancerous distraction

The term superorganism is used most often to describe a social unit of eusocial animals in which *division of labour is highly specialised and individuals cannot survive by themselves for extended periods. 

*so again to me.. cancerous distraction to the dance

*The concept of a superorganism raises the question of what is to be considered an individual.

*again.. to me.. that question (beyond the monastic self ness.. i’m never just me ness.. et al) is a cancerous distraction to the dance

Superorganisms are important in cybernetics, particularly biocybernetics, since they are capable of the so-called “distributed intelligence”, a system composed of individual agents that have limited intelligence and information. They can pool resources and so can complete goals that are beyond reach of the individuals on their own. *Existence of such behavior in organisms has many implications for military and management applications and is being actively researched.

to me.. intellectness as cancerous distraction.. ie: *

Superorganisms are also considered dependent upon cybernetic governance and processes. This is based on the idea that a biological system – in order to be effective – *needs a sub-system of cybernetic communications and control.

*aka: language as control/enclosure et al

_____

_____

noosphere ness et al

_____

____

____

____

______

---