gershenfeld something else law

tech that gives

__________

________

same on issuu

________

Neil‘s response when asked by pentagon how tech could improve defense/safety):

something else neil full

something else to do – the best protection/benefit/betterness.. for the entire world.. is for each person to be/become themselves.. perhaps because it’s then we become .. unoffendable

perhaps we’re clinging to privacy/protection/security/defense et al.. when our protection lies in the seeming chaos.. the order we don’t yet get because it is us emerging.. perhaps we spend our energy\ness …. listening for that…?

ps in the open

entropy ness

entropy as protection lucid

via ie: gershenfeld sel law.. 2 convos .. as the day..[aka: not part\ial.. for (blank)’s sake…] et al.

_________

huge to this: fromm destructiveness law

ie:

from Erich Fromm‘s escape from freedom:

262

the new security is dynamic; it is not based on protection, but on man’s spontaneous activity.. it is the security acquired each moment by man’s spontaneous activity. it is the security that only freedom can give, that needs no illusions because it has eliminated those conditions that necessitate illusions.. 

security ness.. and again.. why gershenfeld sel would work

__________

Ian Welsh (@iwelsh) tweeted at 5:08 AM – 19 Feb 2020 :
local transit should be made ubiquitous and fast, and all local travel on public transit should just be made free, so that the incentives for private transit are shit.
Make it not make sense to do bad things. Even electric cars are not good. Cars are bad for the environment. (http://twitter.com/iwelsh/status/1230101790789599233?s=17)

Make it not make sense to do bad things.

gershenfeld something else law

__________

laws\ish